Trayectoria de la gobernanza en programas de pago por servicios ambientales en México: un análisis de redes sociales

Autores/as

Palabras clave:

Gobernanza ambiental, Análisis de redes sociales, Pago por servicios ambientales hidrológicos, Manejo de cuencas hidrográficas

Resumen

En este trabajo se empleó el Análisis de Redes Sociales (ARS) para analizar la evolución de las redes de gobernanza asociadas a los programas de Pago por Servicios Ambientales Hidrológicos (PSAH) implementados en las subcuencas de los ríos Pixquiac y Gavilanes, Veracruz, México. Se construyeron tres cortes temporales de cada red (etapa inicial, intermedia y final) y se calcularon indicadores de centralidad para evaluar los cambios en las relaciones de colaboración entre los actores participantes. En ambos programas, la densidad de las redes aumentó a lo largo del periodo analizado, mientras que los valores máximos de intermediación registrados en la etapa final fueron inferiores a los de las etapas iniciales. Lo que indica una mayor conectividad y una menor dependencia de actores puente. La centralización se mantuvo en niveles moderados, lo que sugiere estructuras de gobernanza relativamente descentralizadas. Los resultados revelan una asociación entre la operación de los programas y el fortalecimiento de las estructuras de gobernanza. Las diferencias observadas entre ambas subcuencas indican que los arreglos institucionales y los mecanismos de participación influyen en la intensidad de la gobernanza colaborativa.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Alix-Garcia, J.; Slims, K.; Orozco-Olvera, V.; Costica, L.; Fernández, J. y Romo, S. (2018). Payments for environmental services supported social capital while increasing land management. PNAS, 115(27), 7016-7021. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720873115

Arriagada, R.; Sills, E.; Ferraro, P. y Pattanayak, S. (2015). Do payments pay off? Evidence from participation in Costa Rica´s PES program. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131544

Asbjornsen, H.; Manson, R.; Scullion, J.; Holwerda, F.; Muñoz-Villers, L.; Alvarado-Barrientos, S.; Geissert, D.; Dawson, T.; McDonnell, J. y Brujinzeel, A. (2017). Interactions between payments for hydrological services, landowner’s decisions, and ecohydrological consequences: synergies and disconnection in the cloud forest zone of central Veracruz, Mexico. Ecology and Society, 22(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09144-220225

Bodin, Ö. y Crona, B. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 366-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002

Bodin, Ö. y Norberg, J. (2005). Information network topologies for enhanced local adaptive management. Environmental Management, 36, 772-773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-6036-4

Bodin, Ö.; Crona, B. y Ernstson, H. (2006). Social networks in natural resource management: What’s there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecology & Society, 11(2), r2. https://acortar.link/96AofN

Borg, R.; Toikka, A. y Primmer, E. (2015). Social capital and governance: a social network analysis of forest biodiversity collaboration in Central Finland. Forest Policy and Economics, 50, 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.06.008

Borgatti, S.; Everett, M. y Freeman, L. (2011). UCINET: Software for Social Science Network Analysis (version 6.545). https://acortar.link/Tz99wd

Borgatti, S.; Everett, M. y Johnson, J. (2013). Analysing social networks. SAGE Publications Limited.

Brownson, K.; Anderson, E.; Ferreira, S.; Wenger, S.; Fowler, L. y German, L. (2020). Governance of payments for ecosystem services influences social and environmental outcomes in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics, 174, 106659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106659

Chan, C.; Armitage, D.; Alexander, S. y Campbell, D. (2019). Examining linkage between ecosystem services and social wellbeing to improve governance for coastal conservation in Jamaica. Ecosystem Services, 39, 100997. https://doi.org/fb3p

Freeman, L. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7

García-Amado, L.; Ruiz, M.; Iniesta-Arandia, I.; Dahringer, G.; Reyes, F. y Barrasa, S. (2012). Building ties: social capital network analysis of a forest community in a biosphere reserve in Chiapas, Mexico. Ecology and Society, 17(3), 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04855-170303

Gava, O.; Vanni, F.; Schwarz, G.; Guisepelli, E.; Vincent, A.; Prazan, J.; Weisshaidinger, R.; Frick, R.; Hravalobá, A.; Carolus, J.; Yoldi, U.; Pyysiänien, J.; Smyrniotopoulou, A.; Vlahos, G.; Balázs, K.; Szilágyi, A.; Jegelevicius, G.; Miksyte, E.; Zilands, A.; Fratila, M.; Röös, E.; Miller, D. y Povellato, A. (2025). Governance networks for agroecology transition in rural Europe. Journal of Rural Studies 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103482

Hayes, T.; Murtinho, F. (2018). Communal governance, equity and payments for ecosystem services. Land Use Policy, 79, 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.001

Holt, A.; Moug, P. y Lerner, D. (2012). The network governance of urban river corridors. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05200-170425

Knüppe, K. y Knieper, C. (2016). The governance of ecosystem services in river basin: An approach for structured data representation and analysis. Environmental Science and Policy, 66, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.009

Le Coq, J.; Froger, G.; Pesche, D.; Legrand, T. y Saenz, F. (2015). Understanding the governance of the Payment for Environmental Services Programme in Costa Rica: A policy process perspective. Ecosystem Services, 16, 253-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.003

Leavitt, H. J. (1951). Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychopathology, 46(1), 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057189

Lemos, M. y Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. Vol. 31:297-325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621

Loft, L.; Mann, C. y Hansjürgens, B. (2015). Challenges in ecosystem services governance: Multi-levels, multi-actors, multi-rationalities. Ecosystem Services 16, 150-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.002

Mann, C.; Loft, L. y Hansjürgens, B. (2015). Governance of ecosystem services: Lesson learned for sustainable institutions. Ecosystem Services, 16, 275-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.003

Merlo, A.; Ávila-Foucat, V. S. y Perevochtchikova, M. (2024). Collaborative management of hydrological ecosystem services: a multilevel social network analysis of a Mexican watershed. Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02101-1

Miteva, D.; Pattanayak, S. y Ferraro, P. (2012). Evaluation of biodiversity policy instruments: what works and what doesn´t? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28(1), 69-92. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grs009

Muñoz-Piña, C.; Guevara, A.; Torres, J. y Braña, J. (2008). Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico’s forest: Analysis, negotiations and results. Ecological Economics, 65(4), 725-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.031

Muradian, R. y Rival, L. (2013). Ecosystem services and environmental governance: Some concluding remarks. En Roldan Muradian y Laura Rival (eds.), Governing the provision of ecosystem services. Studies in Ecological Economics (vol. 4, pp. 465-471). Springer.

Nava-López, M.; Selfa, T.; Cordoba, D.; Pischke, E.; Torrez, D.; Ávila-Foucat, S.; Halvorsen, K. y Maganda, C. (2018). Decentralizing Payments for Hydrological Services Programs in Veracruz, Mexico: Challenges and Implications for Long-term Sustainability. Society & Natural Resources, 31(12), 1389-1399. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2018.1463420

Pattanayak, S.; Wunder, S. y Ferraro, P. (2010). Show me the money: do payments supply environmental services in developing countries? Review of Environmental Economics Policy, 4 (2), 254-274. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/req006

Perevochtchikova, M. (2014). Aproximación teórico-conceptual a los estudios de servicios ecosistémicos, ambientales y esquemas de compensación. En María Perevochtchikova (coord.). Pago por servicios Ambientales en México: Un acercamiento para su estudio (pp. 17-40). El Colegio de México.

QGIS Association (2018). Geographic Information System (Version 3.4.0) [Sofware de computación] http://www.qgis.org

Reyes-Hernández, H. (2023). Payment for environmental services: Forest conservation and poverty alleviation in a tropical region of Mexico. Land Use Policy, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106847

Schröter, B.; Hauck, J.; Hackenber, I. y Matzdorf, B. (2018). Bringing transparency into the process: Social network analysis as a tool to support the participatory design and implementation process of Payments for Ecosystem Services. Ecosystem Services, 34, 206-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.007

Scott, J. (2000). Social Network Analysis: A handbook. Second Edition. SAGE publications.

Stein, C.; Ernstson, H. y Barron, J. (2011). A social network approach to analyzing water governance: the case of the Mkindo catchment, Tanzania. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 36(14-15), 1085-1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2011.07.083

Valujeva, K.; Freed, E.; Nipers, A.; Jauhiaine, J. y Schulte, R. (2023). Pathways for governance opportunities: Social Network Analysis to create targeted and effective policies for agricultural and environmental development. Journal of Environmental Management, 325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116563

Von-Thaden, J.; Manson, R.; Congalton, R.; López-Barrera, F. y Jones, K. (2021). Evaluating the environmental effectiveness of payment for hydrological services in Veracruz, México: A landscape approach. Land Use Policy, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105055

Von-Thaden, J.; Manson, R.; Congalton, R.; López-Barrera, F. y Salcone, J. (2019). A regional evaluation of the effectiveness of Mexico ́s payments for hydrological services. Regional Environmental Change, 19, 1751-1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01518-3

Wasserman, S. y Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, vol. 8. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478

Wunder, S. (2015). Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 117, 234-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.016

Yamaki, K. (2015). Network governance of endangered species conservation: a case study of Rebun Lady´s-Slipper. Journal for Nature Conservation, 24, 83-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2014.10.004

Yu, H.; Xie, W.; Yang, L.; Du, A.; Almeida, C. y Wang, Y. (2020). From payments for ecosystem services to eco-compensation: Conceptual change or paradigm shift? Science of the Total Environment, 700, 134627. https://doi.org/gk5mv4

Descargas

Publicado

11/06/2026

Cómo citar

Torrez Pérez , D. M. ., & Ávila-Foucat , V. S. . (2026). Trayectoria de la gobernanza en programas de pago por servicios ambientales en México: un análisis de redes sociales. HorizonTes Territoriales, 6(12), 1–26. Recuperado a partir de https://horizontesterritoriales.unach.mx/index.php/Revista/article/view/174